28/08/2013 - Studio promosso dall'Organizzazione mondiale della sanità e pubblicato dalla rivista Lancet.
Uno studio promosso dall'Organizzazione mondiale della sanità (Oms) e pubblicato dalla rivista Lancet infectous diseases, che ha testato le nuove linee-guida sul tema in 43 strutture in cinque Paesi (Mali, Italia, Pakistan, Arabia Saudita e Costa Rica), ha constatato che, in ospedale, sono gli infermieri a mettere in pratica davvero le norme a salvaguardia dell'igiene.
Questo, superando di molto i medici nella pratica del lavaggio delle mani.
La ricerca è durata due anni, durante i quali sono state promosse negli ospedali scelti le linee-guida in questione, l'aderenza ai dettami sul lavaggio delle mani è salita dal 51 al 67%, con miglioramenti riguardanti tutti i centri analizzati.
Gli infermieri si sono dimostrati i più "convinti" sostenitori delle linee-guida, con un tasso di adesione del 71%, mentre i medici sono rimasti fermi al 60%.
Il Rapporto predice inoltre che, su 100 pazienti ricoverati, 7 nei Paesi sviluppati e 10 in quelli in via di sviluppo avranno un'infezione ospedaliera.
Abstract articolo Lancet
lunedì 16 settembre 2013
QS: Cure palliative. Congresso internazionale della Fondazione Ant: “C’è ancora molto da fare”
Il punto sulle più avanzate metodologie per migliorare la vita dei pazienti terminali. Secondo l’OMS sono circa 100 milioni le persone che ne hanno bisogno.Al centro del dibattito anche come utilizzare la morfina e come renderla accessibile a tutti, in tutti i luoghi di cura, per liberare dal dolore
Articolo QS
mercoledì 11 settembre 2013
GIMBE: Vogliono smantellare il Servizio Sanitario Nazionale
Vogliono smantellare il Servizio Sanitario Nazionale
sabato 7 settembre 2013
QS: Infermieri sempre più maschi e sempre meno stranieri
Infermieri sempre più maschi e sempre meno stranieri
I dati dell’Ipasvi sul numero di infermieri professionali iscritti agli Albi provinciali negli ultimi 5 anni mostra questi due cambi di rotta. Gli uomini sono ormai più di uno su quattro. La presenza degli stranieri è passata dal 35,3% nel 2007 al 15,3% nel 2012. Scarica il Rapporto.
martedì 3 settembre 2013
Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2014
Vol 4, No 1 (2014)
Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2014
Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2014, e-Version First TM
Table of Contents
Original Research - 9 articles
Case Report - 1 article
Experience Exchange - 6 articles
Reviews - 1 article
Nursing Reports PagePress: Vol 3, No 1 (2013)
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports is a new, open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives.
The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses.
Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility.
Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
Vol 3, No 1 (2013)
Table of Contents
Original Articles
Interruptions during hospital nurses’ medication administration rounds | |||
Marian Smeulers, Marjoke Hoekstra, Emma van Dijk, Femke Overkamp, Hester Vermeulen | DOI:10.4081/nursrep.2013.e4 | Abstract views: 637 |
The meaning of being young with dementia and living at home | |||
Dag Rostad, Ove Hellzén, Ingela Enmarker | DOI:10.4081/nursrep.2013.e3 | Abstract views: 342 |
lunedì 2 settembre 2013
Online Journal of Nursing Informatics - Volume 17 Number 2 June 2013
Online Journal of Nursing Informatics (OJNI) June 2013
ISSN # 1089-9758 Indexed in CINAHL © 2013
ISSN # 1089-9758 Indexed in CINAHL © 2013
INDEX OF CONTENTS
ARTICLES
Using Social Media to meet the Needs of DNP Preceptors within an Online Program
by Julie D. Slade, RN, DNP, Debra M. Wolf, PhD, RN, Kathleen C. Spadaro PhD, RN, PMHCNS, and Elizabeth A. Gazza PhD, RN, LCCE, FACCE
by Julie D. Slade, RN, DNP, Debra M. Wolf, PhD, RN, Kathleen C. Spadaro PhD, RN, PMHCNS, and Elizabeth A. Gazza PhD, RN, LCCE, FACCE
mHealth: A Vital Link for Ubiquitous Health
by Pammla Petrucka, RN, PhD, Sandra Bassendowski, RN, EdD, Hazel Roberts, MD and Thomas James
by Pammla Petrucka, RN, PhD, Sandra Bassendowski, RN, EdD, Hazel Roberts, MD and Thomas James
A Current Review of the Benefits, Barriers, and Considerations for Implementing Decision Support Systems
by Candice McCool, BSN, RN, CCRN
by Candice McCool, BSN, RN, CCRN
EDITORIALS
Making your web presence known
by Dee McGonigle PhD, RN, FAAN, CNE, Editor in Chief and TRenee M. Eggers PhD
by Dee McGonigle PhD, RN, FAAN, CNE, Editor in Chief and TRenee M. Eggers PhD
Twitter and Nurses: Tips for Tweeting
by June Kaminski, MSN PhD(c), Chief Senior Editor
by June Kaminski, MSN PhD(c), Chief Senior Editor
SENIOR EDITOR COLUMNS
Issues, Impacts and Insights
Preventing the Demise of AHRQ
by Dr. Judith Effken, Senior Editor
by Dr. Judith Effken, Senior Editor
Critical Conversations about Optimal Design
Mobile Technologies for Health Education: What Do We Need to Consider?
by Dr. Eun-Shim Nahm, Guest Editor
by Dr. Eun-Shim Nahm, Guest Editor
Future Thoughts Now
Future Column – v201306
by Dr. Scott Erdley, Senior Editor
by Dr. Scott Erdley, Senior Editor
The Frontier: Floating in the Cloud and Networking in an Internet Connected World
A Systematic Review of the Literature on mHealth: One Perspective
by Dr. Kay Sackett, Senior Editor
by Dr. Kay Sackett, Senior Editor
A Canadian Perspective on Nursing Informatics
On Realizing Value and Visibility
by Dr Lynn Nagle, Senior Editor
by Dr Lynn Nagle, Senior Editor
STUDENT ARTICLES
Scrapbook versus Facebook ©
by April Mackey, BsN, RN
by April Mackey, BsN, RN
domenica 1 settembre 2013
Clinical Nursing Studies: Vol. 1, N° 4 (2013)
Clinical Nursing Studies
Clinical Nursing Studies (PRINT ISSN 2324-7940, ONLINE ISSN 2324-7959) is a peer-reviewed and international nursing journal that focuses on the field of clinical nursing. Strong coverage of ambulatory care, community care, family care, home, hospital, practice, primary and secondary, public health, etc. is provided. CNS aims to enrich insight into clinical need and implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery, enhance clinical practice by pinpointing potential clinical applications of the latest research, and encourage the debate on all spheres of nursing and midwifery practice.
To facilitate rapid publication and to minimize administrative costs, the journal accepts Online submission and Email submission. All manuscripts and any supplementary material can be submitted via the journal’s Online Submission and peer-review system or email to cns@sciedupress.com. For online submission, please create a new account and then follow the instructions given on the screen.
CNS's Section:Original Article, Case Report, Reviews, Experience Exchange.
CNS is included in:
- DOAJ
- Google Scholar
- The Standard Periodical Directory
Statistics
2013 Q1: Articles Received: 28; Accepted: 11; Rejected: 14; Published: 10; Retracted: 2
2013 Q2: Articles Received: 22; Accepted: 9; Rejected: 17; Published: 10; Retracted: 2
Licensed Practical Nurses becoming Registered Nurses: Conflicts and responses that can help
Kathryn Gordon, Sherri Melrose, Katherine J. Janzen, Jean Miller
Abstract
This article describes findings from a qualitative research project designed to understand the professional socializationexperiences of Licensed Practical Nurses attending university to transition to the role of Registered Nurse. Findingsrevealed that this group of nursing students believed (Licensed Practical Nurse) LPN’s were not respected, that theirnursing knowledge as LPN’s was not acknowledged and that it was challenging for them to feel a sense of belonging withthe RN community. These insights have implications for practicing (Registered Nurse) RN’s as student nurse groups arenow including more Licensed Practical Nurses. Responding with reflection, communication and collegiality can offerimportant help to LPN to RN students.
Women’s perception of safety and utilization of herbal remedies during pregnancy in a local government area in Nigeria
A. E. Olowokere, O. Olajide
Abstract
This descriptive study examined the perception of safety and utilization of herbal remedies during pregnancy using a convenience sampling of 300 women. The women who participated in the study were selected at household level from rural communities in Ife-North local government area of Osun state in Nigeria. Data was collected with the aid of semi-structured questionnaire using interviewer-administered method after informed consent had been taken from each participant. The results show that the women had positive perception about the safety and efficacy of herbs over conventional drugs in pregnancy. Greater percentage of the participants studied had used herbs at one point or the other during pregnancy. Local concoction also referred to as “Agbo” was the most used herbs by the women. The need for laboratory exploration of these herbs was emphasized by this study because of the high usage by pregnant women without any empirical evidence on its safety and efficacy.
APORIA - 2013, Vol. 5, Issue 3
Editorial
PATRICK MARTIN & PHI-PHUONG PHAM
Pink Masks: Obstructive Sleep Apnoea and the Sociology of Diagnosis
SHARON HANCOCK & ANNEMARIE JUTEL
Loopy: The Political Ontology of Bipolar Disorder
RACHEL JANE LIEBERT
Face Assemblages & Sex Machines: A Theoretical Exploration of Online Sociability of Men who Have Sex with Men
LUIZ FELIPE ZAGO & DAVE HOLMES
Commentary
Lessons from the Ottawa 20: Reclaiming the ethics review process to advance academic freedom
ADRIAN GUTA & VICTORIA BUNGAY
Research article
The prevalence of pain at pressure areas and pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients
Michelle Briggs1*, Michelle Collinson2, Lyn Wilson2, Carly Rivers3, Elizabeth McGinnis4,Carol Dealey5, Julia Brown2, Susanne Coleman2, Nikki Stubbs6, Rebecca Stevenson2, E Andrea Nelson7 and Jane Nixon2
- *Corresponding author: Michelle Briggs m.i.briggs@leedsmet.ac.uk
1Centre for Pain Research, Queens Square House, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK
2Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
3Rick Hansen Institute, 6400-818 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
4Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
5Clinical Research Unit, Old Nuclear Medicine, Research & Development - University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, 1st Floor Pharmacy Building, Room 3, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
6Tissue Viability, St Mary’s Hospital, Greenhill Road, Armley LS12 3QE, UK
7School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Room 1.25, Baines Wing, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
For all author emails, please log on.
BMC Nursing 2013, 12:19 doi:10.1186/1472-6955-12-19
The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/12/19
Received: | 9 January 2013 |
Accepted: | 3 July 2013 |
Published: | 31 July 2013 |
© 2013 Briggs et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Background
Patients with pressure ulcers (PUs) report that pain is their most distressing symptom, but there are few PU pain prevalence studies. We sought to estimate the prevalence of unattributed pressure area related pain (UPAR pain) which was defined as pain, soreness or discomfort reported by patients, on an “at risk” or PU skin site, reported at a patient level.
Methods
We undertook pain prevalence surveys in 2 large UK teaching hospital NHS Trusts (6 hospitals) and a district general hospital NHS Trust (3 hospitals) during their routine annual PU prevalence audits. The hospitals provide secondary and tertiary care beds in acute and elective surgery, trauma and orthopaedics, burns, medicine, elderly medicine, oncology and rehabilitation. Anonymised individual patient data were recorded by the ward nurse and PU prevalence team. The analysis of this prevalence survey included data summaries; no inferential statistical testing was planned or undertaken. Percentages were calculated using the total number of patients from the relevant population as the denominator (i.e. including all patients with missing data for that variable).
Results
A total of 3,397 patients in 9 acute hospitals were included in routine PU prevalence audits and, of these, 2010 (59.2%) patients participated in the pain prevalence study. UPAR pain prevalence was 16.3% (327/2010). 1769 patients had no PUs and of these 223 patients reported UPAR pain, a prevalence of 12.6%. Of the 241 people with pressure ulcers, 104 patients reported pain, a UPAR pain prevalence of 43.2% (104/241).
Conclusion
One in six people in acute hospitals experience UPAR pain on ‘at risk’ or PU skin sites; one in every 8 people without PUs and, more than 2 out of every five people with PUs. The results provide a clear indication that all patients should be asked if they have pain at pressure areas even when they do not have a PU.
Keywords:
Pain; Pressure ulcers; Risk assessment; Prevalence
Iscriviti a:
Post (Atom)